ext_993 (
cesperanza.livejournal.com) wrote in
sga_flashfic2006-08-21 11:40 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
ADMIN: Mission Report Clarification (aka "Running Challenges Is Harrrrd")
Whoa, whoa--okay, okay! We hear you! While we remain philosophically committed to the idea that people have the right to make art based on other art provided that due credit is given the original artist, this is supposed to be fun, not a referendum on the nature of derivative works.
Also, we'd like this to be less work for us.
So here's what we're gonna do. DO ask permission if you want to try option C in the Mission Report challenge. In order to make it easier for this to happen, I'm going to make two other posts--a global opt-in and a global opt-out (to spare people who don't want to be bothered asking or refusing individuals.)
If you opted out already--and opted out without exception, because a number of you said "just ask for permission" which is now the default--so if you opted out without exception, I'll put your name on the global opt-out post, so don't worry; you're covered.
If you would like to opt-in globally, please drop a comment on the opt-in post.
If you're not sure, do nothing! Wait for someone to contact you, or not! (I actually personally think we're not going to get many option c)'s in general, because I think they're going to be hard to write--but I'd love to be surprised.)
While I'm here, another couple of points of clarification:
1) I suppose I'm to blame for using the word "remix"; please note that this is NOT a conventional remix, but a mission report. The idea of c) is to tell the same story, differently--in mission report form--not to change the original story in a radical way; if something really weird happened on mission, how might that come across in the formal report?
2) We were surprised by how many people feared having gen stories or other-pairing stories mixed into McShep. That was certainly not the intention of the challenge--again, this was supposed to be a mission report challenge, so it's supposed to reflect (distort, embellish, conceal) what actually happened on the mission, the original story being the mission.
3)
corinna_5 asked a great question: "Can ONLY stories in mission-report format can be submitted? Or is it that the idea of the "mission report" can be played with in the way, say "documentation" was in that challenge? " Answer: No, you can write stories about or that feature mission reports as key plot points; we continue to preach latitude in the hope that we get as many good stories as possible.
If you have any other questions or comments or DO want to keep debating the nature of derivative art, please comment here. If you are GLOBALLY OPTING IN or OUT, please comment in one of the two next posts!!
Out for now--
Also, we'd like this to be less work for us.
So here's what we're gonna do. DO ask permission if you want to try option C in the Mission Report challenge. In order to make it easier for this to happen, I'm going to make two other posts--a global opt-in and a global opt-out (to spare people who don't want to be bothered asking or refusing individuals.)
If you opted out already--and opted out without exception, because a number of you said "just ask for permission" which is now the default--so if you opted out without exception, I'll put your name on the global opt-out post, so don't worry; you're covered.
If you would like to opt-in globally, please drop a comment on the opt-in post.
If you're not sure, do nothing! Wait for someone to contact you, or not! (I actually personally think we're not going to get many option c)'s in general, because I think they're going to be hard to write--but I'd love to be surprised.)
While I'm here, another couple of points of clarification:
1) I suppose I'm to blame for using the word "remix"; please note that this is NOT a conventional remix, but a mission report. The idea of c) is to tell the same story, differently--in mission report form--not to change the original story in a radical way; if something really weird happened on mission, how might that come across in the formal report?
2) We were surprised by how many people feared having gen stories or other-pairing stories mixed into McShep. That was certainly not the intention of the challenge--again, this was supposed to be a mission report challenge, so it's supposed to reflect (distort, embellish, conceal) what actually happened on the mission, the original story being the mission.
3)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
If you have any other questions or comments or DO want to keep debating the nature of derivative art, please comment here. If you are GLOBALLY OPTING IN or OUT, please comment in one of the two next posts!!
Out for now--
no subject
I want to take this opportunity to make the point I was skirting in all my other posts. I realize that we don't own fanfic stories, that we do not enjoy the protection of a copyright. To my way of thinking, that's the biggest reason that we should always hold ourselves to the standard of asking permission before using someone else's material. Because we have no legal recourse, we must rely on the integrity of our peers to ensure that our work be respected, our rights not be abused. Posting a fanfic story is the ultimate act of faith and trust in the publishing world, because we have no means of preventing appropriation of anything we came up with ourselves. We have to be self-policing, and that means we must all treat each other just as though we do have copyrights on the stories we turn out. If we don't, then this ceases to be fun and rewarding and just becomes one more area of hassle and discord in our lives.
Be good to each other. That's all I ask.
no subject
2) We were surprised by how many people feared having gen stories or other-pairing stories mixed into McShep. That was certainly not the intention of the challenge--again, this was supposed to be a mission report challenge, so it's supposed to reflect (distort, embellish, conceal)( what actually happened on the mission, the original story being the mission.
Given that pretty much ANY pairing you see on either of the Stargates is via reading subtext, I don't think it's a huge shift to have concerns that your gen story be written with pairing-postive glasses on. Which is not necessarily a bad thing...unless that rubs the original author the wrong way.
YMMV.
Anyway, thanks again. I know the response to the previous entry was eye-opening for me, on a number of fronts.
no subject
ADMIN:
I don't see why not! (Though survey says: ask the artist! *g*)
no subject
I'm one of the "ask for permission" people, my global pen-name being Trialia, so I guess I don't have to comment on the other posts, right?
no subject
Outside fandom flash fiction (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_fiction) is generally any short story; in fandom, I think it also has the connotation that the story is short *and* the author wrote it relatively quickly.
no subject
Because we hate and fear you crazy people and your Pairing That Ate the Universe! You'll stop at NOTHING, and don't think we haven't noticed! *g*
But in spite of that, Ces, you are the coolest. Your coolness is, in fact, the very reason I should never be in charge of anything, ever, and I'm sorry I suck so badly at keeping my mouth shut in the totally improper forum. I'll try to be nicer in the future.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I got that, love - it's just that I'm very grateful for the chance to say "I might have only that one stupid AU that nobody will want to write a mission report about and technically my story isn't my own but thank you nevertheless for not touching it". I'm particular that way. And very grateful. And I'm looking forward to the reports that will come out of the challenge, because it is a great idea - with all the possible no-nos and caveats attached.
Again: you rock.
no subject
no subject
I've since seen those names and characterisations used in fics that made me want to spork out my eyes (especially being as conservative as I am in certain areas) - it's painful. And frustrating. And it makes AK want to torture helpless kittens in transference.
I feel the need to voice my displeasure because I only found out about this indirectly. I spend my time logged into a personal blog rather than a fandom one, and I'm sure other authors do the same. I would be appalled to find my fics had been used without permission (however unlikely it is) because I had missed the 'Opt-Out' post.
I know it's an attempt at democracy, but I can only see it going horrendously wrong, somehow.
Also, I think that there should be a middle-ground post, rather than a 'do nothing' option. I'm not prepared to say 'yes' to anything, and I don't want to stifle someone's creativity if the crazy bugger thinks they can make something good out of what I've churned out (assuming I accept their idea within the realms of the alfiverse), but by the same token, I don't want someone to come write something I despise from one of my fics and credit me for it.
I guess it's probably because
no subject
Sorry, to clarify -- we are requiring people to get permission now, so the "do-nothing" option means that people are free to ask you and you can say yes/no on a case by case basis -- which I think is what you are asking for? Or are you suggesting something else that I am missing?
no subject
But I've opted out, anyway.
The prospect of people screwing with my pride and joy frightens me.
no subject
Just wanted you to know.
And the "please no McShep" thing was just a caution toward authors who might otherwise be tempted. ;)
no subject
On a personal level, I absolutely agree with asking for permission first - it's the polite thing to do. But, can someone demand that kind of politeness if they don't apply it themselves? Obviously there is a differentiation: on the one hand, the relation between the creators of the show and the fanfic writers, and on the other hand, the relation between the fanfic writers themselves. If a fanfic author does not ask permission from the creators of a show to use their characters, is it okay to insist on being asked permission if their fanfic is being used by someone else? Or is there a reason I'm not aware of (and the likeliness for that is pretty high) for this kind of differentiation?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2006-08-21 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)In conclusion: You can not apply this kind of politeness to yourself.
no subject
I love my big gay fandom!
And an excellent time to say, off-topic: KATCHOO!
KATCHOO! *wiggles with glee*
That is all.
no subject
no subject
Thanks for the clarification.
no subject
And it was in astonishingly bad taste to state that permissions weren't necessary. I'm glad that you redid policy to state that permissions would be required, I just feel that it should have been there from the first, just in the interest of good fandom manners and publicity for the comm.
But. This challenge does sound like a fun time, somewhat like
(if this isn't the time/place for this comment, all apologies, feel free to delete, etc.)
no subject
Way to correct oversights, guys. This? Is why I like this fandom, and the people in it.
no subject
Isn't there a whole (somewhat discredited) field of literary criticism in which you're only allowed to think about things in the way in which you think the author would have wanted you to?
--Challenge Suggestion--
Who cuts their hair? Washes dishes? Cleans the ever-mythical toilets? Mops the 'gate room? Decides the menu? Etc.
Or what about a fic in which the characters are forced to fill these roles? Does Atlantis have a kitchen rotation?
Could be fun. :)
no subject
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/060829roswell.htm
Forget the article, just the headline.
no subject
Icarus
no subject
Icarus
no subject
no subject