Title: Rodney McKay Is A Very Bad Manager
Author:
synecdochic
Warnings: Gratuitous use of Microsoft Word documents.
Spoilers: Not really.
Notes: Written for the Documentation Challenge. No, this really isn't my way of dealing with the trauma of January being Performance Review Month. Really. If you don't have Word, you can download a reader here.
Author:
Warnings: Gratuitous use of Microsoft Word documents.
Spoilers: Not really.
Notes: Written for the Documentation Challenge. No, this really isn't my way of dealing with the trauma of January being Performance Review Month. Really. If you don't have Word, you can download a reader here.
PINE 4.44 MESSAGE TEXTInbox Msg 1892 of 1892 100% Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 26:17:04 AST From: Elizabeth Weir <eweir@localhost> To: Rodney McKay <rmckay@localhost> Subject: Performance Reviews Rodney, I know you're busy, but Dr. Zelenka's performance review is extremely overdue, and I need you to have it done before tomorrow's databurst back to Earth. Please take a moment and get it to me first thing tomorrow morning. --Elizabeth ? Help < MsgIndex P PrevMsg - PrevPage D Delete R Reply O OTHER CMDS > ViewAttch N NextMsg Spc NextPage U Undelete F Forward PINE 4.44 MESSAGE TEXT Inbox Msg 12 of 12 79% Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:39:12 AST From: "Dr. Rodney McKay" <rmckay@localhost> To: Elizabeth Weir <eweir@localhost> Subject: Re: Performance Reviews Parts/Attachments: 1 Shown 2 lines Text 2 OK 60 KB Application (See attached file: RZelenka.doc) [ Part 2, Application/MSWORD 59KB. ] [ Not Shown. Use the "V" command to view or save this part. ] What lobotomized rhesus monkey designed this thing? If you want anything more detailed than this, do it yourself; I don't have time. ? Help < MsgIndex P PrevMsg - PrevPage D Delete R Reply O OTHER CMDS > ViewAttch N NextMsg Spc NextPage U Undelete F Forward PINE 4.44 MESSAGE TEXT Inbox Msg 1934 of 1934 100% Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:20:53 AST From: Elizabeth Weir <eweir@localhost> To: Rodney McKay <rmckay@localhost> Subject: Re: Performance Reviews Why don't we just send it with next week's transmission. That will give you time to carefully evaluate your comments and provide more in-depth analysis of Dr. Zelenka's strengths and weaknesses. -- Elizabeth PS: You are not allowed to use the words "idiotic", "moron", "mouthbreather", or "cretin". Come to think of it, you're overdue for the anti-harassment training. Please schedule some time to complete the web-based training course as soon as possible. ? Help < MsgIndex P PrevMsg - PrevPage D Delete R Reply O OTHER CMDS > ViewAttch N NextMsg Spc NextPage U Undelete F Forward
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 10:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 11:06 am (UTC)The prospect of writing this was the only thing that kept me sane during the whole process of writing performance reviews for my staff. I'm glad you enjoyed it. I had this perpetual image of Rodney having been awake for 36 hours working on something critical, opening the file, and saying "...You have got to be kidding me." :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 11:19 am (UTC)Making sure things don’t blow up/fail to blow up (as applicable)
*giggles*
Does get credit for being able to apparently read my mind
Aww!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 11:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 11:34 am (UTC)Ahahahaha! They are total pussies for using PINE though ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 11:38 am (UTC)(Rodney's inbox is actually smaller than mine is right now. I need an email day *so badly*.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 11:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 12:00 pm (UTC)(The form, sadly enough, is not fictional. I just stripped the company-specific stuff.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 01:16 pm (UTC)My sympathies are totally with Rodney - I find it a complee waste of time to fill out 10 pages of guff and only wish we could complete ours as honestly as Rdoney has done here *G*
I really did love this.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 08:44 pm (UTC)I almost did Rodney doing Kavanagh's review, but I didn't feel like thinking up thirty-seven synonyms for "idiot". :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 01:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 08:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 01:56 pm (UTC)I am grateful that of all the bad managers I've had, none have been Rodney McKay. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:01 pm (UTC)(I actually think that Rodney isn't *as* bad as fanon usually has it. He's derisive and short-tempered and really, really bad at "professional", but as someone who's worked with (and for) a lot of geeks and engineers and other technical people, the Rodney I see in the show comes across more as "impatient and short-tempered with all the pressures on himself and with others" and not "fundamentally incapable of interacting with other humans" the way some of the tech people I've worked with have been. I have had *much* worse managers than Rodney.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 03:03 pm (UTC)I loved this! The main goal is not to die horribly...or embarass the name of science. That sounds about right.
Anti-harassment training. Yeah right. Good Luck Elizabeth!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:04 pm (UTC)(I think the only way Elizabeth would get Rodney to anti-harassment training would be to TIE HIM DOWN. Or have John do it. *g*)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 03:31 pm (UTC):-) xx
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 03:51 pm (UTC)Very Rodney! Now I want to see the 'self-reflection' section ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 04:12 pm (UTC)Very funny, thanks!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 04:50 pm (UTC)And yes, Rodney would be a nightmare to have as a manager. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:16 pm (UTC)Maybe I'm just skewed from having worked for geeks and engineers for a really, really long time, though. It's amazing how many people in the tech field are like, poster children for Asperger's syndrome.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 05:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 05:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:18 pm (UTC)very bad manager
Date: 2006-01-29 05:53 pm (UTC)That's SO Rodney!! I loved his response to the form and his comments. Nicely done. I adore Rodney on the show, but in reality, he would be an absolute nightmare to work with.
Re: very bad manager
Date: 2006-01-29 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 07:25 pm (UTC)This is pretty much perfect. You got their voices, your attention to detail makes my day. Rodney has got to be a HIDEOUSLY bad manager, for which I love him dearly. *g* And I'd love to see Zelenka's comment.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 07:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 08:04 pm (UTC)This is a great little thing, and I loved Rodney's backhanded compliments for Radek. Can't wait to see his responses.
If he has to take the same harrassment training I did, though, I predict fireworks: it's so fucking slow...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:45 pm (UTC)For the Atlantis expedition, though, the one main reason I think they'd go with something *nix would be the tech support factor. It costs a LOT more in both time and money to support MS, and they'd be planning the expedition for long-term sustainability...
(I may have done way too much thinking about this.)
I really do think Radek's response would be something along the lines of "That was far nicer than I would have expected." He knows Rodney. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 08:31 pm (UTC)Oh, yes. I went there. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 08:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:14 pm (UTC)This? This is brilliant.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-29 09:52 pm (UTC)